cyklondx
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2018
- Messages
- 419
there are other systems. Win isn't the only one, it is certainly one of the worst you could get though.Sounds like a great idea if you don't want a computer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
there are other systems. Win isn't the only one, it is certainly one of the worst you could get though.Sounds like a great idea if you don't want a computer.
It is the best for a desktop os, period.there are other systems. Win isn't the only one, it is certainly one of the worst you could get though.
It is the best for a desktop os, period.
If you’re into gaming, yes. I’ve tried a billion times to mix Linux and gaming and it just isn’t there yet.It is the best for a desktop os, period.
Or most industry standard tools.If you’re into gaming, yes. I’ve tried a billion times to mix Linux and gaming and it just isn’t there yet.
Good job. You understood an obvious opinion.opinion is not fact. Try and separate the two.
As long as that's an opinion. PERIOD. LOLGood job. You understood an obvious opinion.
That was also a big downer for me.Or most industry standard tools.
If you are into gaming why don't u get xbone instead? No?If you’re into gaming, yes. I’ve tried a billion times to mix Linux and gaming and it just isn’t there yet.
I agree that app support (games especially) is solid on Windows, but Linux has been getting better.
For example the Steam beta with Proton, a lot of Windows only games work with maybe minor issues (not all games work, but more than you think).
Also, FOSS apps like GIMP and Blender have made big improvements in the last year or so, but I can understand if you need a specific app for work.
Well one thing that Windows HAD on Linux was stability. Lately that's been an issue for windows, These windows 10 rolling updates have sucked qc. I'd have to say Linux has been more update stable lately. Think about that one.
When was Linux unstable? I haven't experienced an updating issue on a distro that wasn't rolling release for many, many years now. Even rolling release is pretty good these days.
That's not my experience until the last couple years. Package "QA" is much better now for Linux. Not an updating issue per se.. but bad app versions (development, versioning). The core update methodology is clean as it's been for years. (apt, dnf.. ect)
lol theyve been saying that for 20 years...but Linux has been getting better.
Yes. Literally a billion.If you are into gaming why don't u get xbone instead? No?
i doubt that number "billion"
Today rhel flavors or suse already have everything; and if you really need gaming just play the good games that are available on linux. 90% of all games that are not available on linux are trash anyway; and you can still play all of them on emulator or kvm.
In terms of industry standard tools, which ones? I mean damn maya is available on nix.
Server and desktop are two different worlds.OK, interesting. I'd have to say I haven't experienced a Linux stability issue for a good five years at least, personally I don't think any OS is 100% faultless in this regard but I don't see many servers crashing and Linux forms the backbone of the Internet.
Server and desktop are two different worlds.
But any organization worth their salt extensively test server packages and system compatibility on their own. Desktop and workstation are secondary. I’m talking enterprise.Not looking for an argument, my experiences simply don't reflect your own. Ubuntu Server and Desktop still use the same file system/package manager.
But any organization worth their salt extensively test server packages and system compatibility on their own. Desktop and workstation are secondary. I’m talking enterprise.
ohohoho, if you spent just a million times on trying to fix it for everyone.Yes. Literally a billion.
It is an evil practice, and Microsoft is notorious for doing this.
And that comment gets the crowd roaring with laughter.I think it is widely enough accepted now that Microsoft 10 is a BAD PRODUCT. That being the case the following phrase has become as ubiquitous as "can it run Crysis"
"Ahem.... Linux Anyone?"
I think it is widely enough accepted now that Microsoft 10 is a BAD PRODUCT. That being the case the following phrase has become as ubiquitous as "can it run Crysis"
"Ahem.... Linux Anyone?"
Microsoft may also be running an A/B test on the local login option.
Would explain why some people get it and some people do not.
I think I’m gonna dual boot my next PC build and give it another go. What flavor of Linux are you currently running?When it comes to gaming, I most definitely wouldn't say "Linux isn't there yet", as that's just not the case.
Considering SteamPlay/Proton and Lutris, both of which are simple to use, Linux now has vastly more titles available to it than MacOS and in a number of cases performance is just as good as Windows if not better in the case of Vulkan titles. Considering the current state of drivers, Linux has a wider range of hardware available to it compared to MacOS, Linux can run current Nvidia graphics cards, MacOS cannot. Considering OGL support as well as Vulkan support, Linux fully supports OGL and Vulkan, MacOS does not. Considering file system/scheduler performance, which is important considering Vulkan, Linux performs better than Windows.
Basically, Linux is now the second most desirable gaming platform under Steam. Forget topping Windows, it's never going to happen considering the amount of time Windows has been the developers platform of choice - This is a no brainer.
There are still some challenges to overcome, Freesync for example is still fairly limited IMO, not too sure about G-Sync however I do know the Nvidia drivers under Linux support it - Such issues are scheduled to be resolved by December, January at the latest. So development is pressing forward at a fairly quick pace.
Sure, if you want 4k/Ultra in every title, at this point in time it's probably best to stick to Windows for a consistent experience. But I run 4k/High settings in many titles with some titles dropped down to 1080p as it scales perfectly into 4k and my gaming experience under Linux satisfies me perfectly. Not looking for an argument, just a little perspective on the matter.
I think I’m gonna dual boot my next PC build and give it another go. What flavor of Linux are you currently running?
If you have more than one computer, do not dual boot, it is not worth it. Just install it on one of the computers and enjoy. The best is Ubuntu 18.04 LTS if you want simple stability.
I think I’m gonna dual boot my next PC build and give it another go. What flavor of Linux are you currently running?
When it comes to gaming, I most definitely wouldn't say "Linux isn't there yet", as that's just not the case.
Considering SteamPlay/Proton and Lutris, both of which are simple to use, Linux now has vastly more titles available to it than MacOS and in a number of cases performance is just as good as Windows if not better in the case of Vulkan titles. Considering the current state of drivers, Linux has a wider range of hardware available to it compared to MacOS, Linux can run current Nvidia graphics cards, MacOS cannot. Considering OGL support as well as Vulkan support, Linux fully supports OGL and Vulkan, MacOS does not. Considering file system/scheduler performance, which is important considering Vulkan, Linux performs better than Windows.
Basically, Linux is now the second most desirable gaming platform under Steam. Forget topping Windows, it's never going to happen considering the amount of time Windows has been the developers platform of choice - This is a no brainer.
There are still some challenges to overcome, Freesync for example is still fairly limited IMO, not too sure about G-Sync however I do know the Nvidia drivers under Linux support it - Such issues are scheduled to be resolved by December, January at the latest. So development is pressing forward at a fairly quick pace.
Sure, if you want 4k/Ultra in every title, at this point in time it's probably best to stick to Windows for a consistent experience. But I run 4k/High settings in many titles with some titles dropped down to 1080p as it scales perfectly into 4k and my gaming experience under Linux satisfies me perfectly. Not looking for an argument, just a little perspective on the matter.
Being the second most desirable gaming platform under steam is not that much of accomplishment, considering there is really only two players in the PC market. I would say also that when it comes to gaming, Linux is not there yet. Now, if the games you are playing are on Linux are there and you want to play them there, great but, many, many games are not there at all yet.
Now, I am pleased to see there are more options for people and I have always been a more options are better kind of person. However, I also am not a person who is going to limit myself to only one of those options, since there is no need for that. Windows is a solid Workstation, gaming and all around operating system, even today. Linux is a really good programmers OS and second option for those who want to use it as a Workstation and sometimes gaming OS.
Now, I am going to go try out Shadow of the Tomb Raider on my Ubuntu install, later.
Edit: Oh, but I am going to try Star Control: Origins first.
There's three players in the PC gaming market, a Mac is still an x64 based PC with a locked down EFI.
I'm sure using Windows as an all in one solution suits your needs just fine, however that by no means makes it the only option.