kirbyrj
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2005
- Messages
- 30,588
6 cores for $300 and 8 cores for $450, is some shit pricing in late 2022.
It's technically not a price increase over the last generation launch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
6 cores for $300 and 8 cores for $450, is some shit pricing in late 2022.
The 7700x costs $150 more than the 5700x.It's technically not a price increase over the last generation launch.
The 7700x costs $150 more than the 5700x.
And this is about more than pricing Vs. previous gen. Intel's 12th gen mixed up the pricing for core counts. And Raptorlake is further increasing core counts on the i5, i7, and i9.
It also replaces the x800 like I said earlier. They are saving the 7800x for the 3D cache.The 7700x costs the same as the 8C/16T Zen 3 part did at launch. The others are identical. If the late to market 5700x is your best argument, you're grasping too much. Both the high end and low end are the exact same price.
Agreed!I love that AMD is going to support Socket AM5 through 2025...
I love that AMD is going to support Socket AM5 through 2025...
Considering 2023 is a stone's throw away, I am having a hard time generating the "Such Wow! Much Excite!" for a hair over 2 years. That's just 2 maybe 3 CPU gens on the same board. If they'd said 2027 and 4 CPU gens it would at least close to the 5 CPU gens of AM4 supported (Excavator & Ryzen 1000, 2000, 3000 and 5000 CPUs).
they said it would be supported until at least 2025 and likely beyond...
What alternate dimension are you posting from where things are cheaper in 2022?6 cores for $300 and 8 cores for $450, is some shit pricing in late 2022.
Looks interesting but the TDP has greatly increased compared to it's predecessors and such a high clock speed as well.
"In the released line-up I noticed that after the 7950X and 7900X they drop down to the 7700X. I thought this puzzling as with the 5000 series we had no 5700X until very late and the same time roughly as the 5800X3D.It also replaces the x800 like I said earlier. They are saving the 7800x for the 3D cache.
Yeah I think 7800x will just be 7800x3d and thats it. Good move on their part really to simplify the product stack."In the released line-up I noticed that after the 7950X and 7900X they drop down to the 7700X. I thought this puzzling as with the 5000 series we had no 5700X until very late and the same time roughly as the 5800X3D.
My crystal ball guess here in the 7800X slot will stay empty until AMD wants to release it as the 7800X3D exclusively when they feel the need to solidify it as the top gaming chip. My guess is 3D cache is difficult still beyond 8 cores or not economical.
https://hardforum.com/threads/thoughts-on-am5-cpu-line-up.2021280/
Like I said on Aug 10th. So like you said? Did you beat my date then?
Cries in 2700xSeem on the upper side of the possible/expectation both for IPC and frequency (AMD presentation are quite nice, leaving the benchmark they do loose in and so on), could be quite worthy of an upgrade for the 3xxx users.
Yep, Even if raptor lake is a little faster that's it for that socket/chipset. AM5 will be good for a few years.5800X here, too. Honestly, I doubt any of these will make much difference in 4K gaming. Maybe 1-5% and only with maintaining extra high FPS. Newer titles ARE starting to push the CPU a little more, though. The trick is, I'm giving this thing away and I don't exactly feel like buying dying tech to replace it. Will probably be looking at the 7900 or whatever Intel's high end is. There's no chance I'm buying anything (except maybe a case) until after Intel's presentation.
5800X here, too. Honestly, I doubt any of these will make much difference in 4K gaming. Maybe 1-5% and only with maintaining extra high FPS. Newer titles ARE starting to push the CPU a little more, though. The trick is, I'm giving this thing away and I don't exactly feel like buying dying tech to replace it. Will probably be looking at the 7900 or whatever Intel's high end is. There's no chance I'm buying anything (except maybe a case) until after Intel's presentation.
I think most people in this forum upgrade for the itch more so than necessity...
I usually get about 50-60% of what I paid for my hardware if I sell it to upgrade to the latest thing. That tends to cut the price of what I'm upgrading to just about in half. It's always let me stay current without breaking the bank too badly.exactly...I upgrade my GPU frequently but I like keeping my CPU for years until I really need to upgrade...you see the same people here upgrading their GPU, CPU etc every single time a new launch happens mostly out of want vs need...and they'll say "I sold my current GPU and got 85% of what I paid for it"...total BS
I usually get about 50-60% of what I paid for my hardware if I sell it to upgrade to the latest thing. That tends to cut the price of what I'm upgrading to just about in half. It's always let me stay current without breaking the bank too badly.
I do pretty much the same thing for CPU's, motherboards and whatever. When I put stuff up for sale at those prices, it rarely stays for very long.50% for a last gen GPU makes sense...
I went from 5800X to 12700K and was pleased with the performance increase. I think I'll drop in a Raptor Lake and then wait to see what the next generation brings for AMD and Intel.5800X here, too. Honestly, I doubt any of these will make much difference in 4K gaming. Maybe 1-5% and only with maintaining extra high FPS. Newer titles ARE starting to push the CPU a little more, though. The trick is, I'm giving this thing away and I don't exactly feel like buying dying tech to replace it. Will probably be looking at the 7900 or whatever Intel's high end is. There's no chance I'm buying anything (except maybe a case) until after Intel's presentation.
It was clearly understood that 5.7ghz would be single core. Of course it will start to drop frequency the more cores get used at once. Nothing different from what Intel does with. Everyone cheery picks and makes miss leading graphs to show their performance gains. No one should be taking any chip makers word and should always check several 3rd party reviews.Not impressed at all with Zen4.
-6000/3000 is the NEW 4000/2000 IF speeds(some not all were able to hit 4000/2000mhz).
- BOOST Freq means NOTHING. Effective clocks do.
- X3D this gen BETTER not be locked for overclocking.
- 5.1ghz all core tells me 5.7 "Boost" freq won't be common hence why in the Keynote AMD stated "Up to" keyword.
- AMD EXPO is nothing more than XMP/DOCP
Waiting on 3rd Party reviews. AMD's first party benchmarks are cherry picked and BIAS not showing you the performance of their chips, rather the performance of their PLATFORM/Ecosystem.
Considering 2023 is a stone's throw away, I am having a hard time generating the "Such Wow! Much Excite!" for a hair over 2 years. That's just 2 maybe 3 CPU gens on the same board. If they'd said 2027 and 4 CPU gens it would at least close to the 5 CPU gens of AM4 supported (Excavator & Ryzen 1000, 2000, 3000 and 5000 CPUs).