Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is water coolng worth the money if I will be only gaming on my pc for maybe 4 hours I will not be overclocking my cpu or gpu.
Watercooling is only worth it if you fall into at least one of the following categories:
1. You desire high overclocks not achievable on air.
2. You desire quietness at temps not achievable on air.
3. You desire to watercool for the fun of it.
If none of those statements are true to you, watercooling is NEVER worth it. And when we say watercooling, we mean full custom watercooling. AIO watercooling is no different from air cooling in terms of performance, simplicity, and ease of use.
*raises hand*![]()
I like tinkering with stuff, and it seems sometimes I enjoy tinkering more than actually using the damn computer
As for quietness, well in my case I almost ended up ripping apart my loop. Even with just a CPU loop, my computer got so quiet the pump noise from the D5 vario actually started bugging me. My pump/res setup is similar to BIG$pender's except I'm using a Koolance COV-RP450 top. I tried decoupling the pump with some 1/2" hard foam sandwiched between egg carton. This did remove the extremely annoying high-pitched ringing sound but there's still a faint, droning hum. Ironically ramping up the fans just enough to mask the hum was far more fruitful than me trying to add additional foam.
Also discovered that I had to find the sweet spot for pump acoustics. Turning down the D5 to the lowest setting actually resulted in WORSE humming. Somewhere between 4 and 5 the humming on my D5 seems to reach a minimum, and that's where I have it currently.
There are no "quality" CLCs out there. They all use very low powered pumps, cheap radiators and noisy fans.
You need ot read my pervious posts instead of jumping in and interpreting out of context.My H240X says otherwise...
Is water coolng worth the money if I will be only gaming on my pc for maybe 4 hours I will not be overclocking my cpu or gpu.
Really to each their own. I enjoy building my computer and watercooling allows me to push the limits of what it can do. A plus is the fact that it's super quiet now. Have you heard 290x's with 100% fan? I compare it to a 747 on take off.
Watercooling is only worth it if you fall into at least one of the following categories:
1. You desire high overclocks not achievable on air.
2. You desire quietness at temps not achievable on air.
3. You desire to watercool for the fun of it.
If none of those statements are true to you, watercooling is NEVER worth it. And when we say watercooling, we mean full custom watercooling. AIO watercooling is no different from air cooling in terms of performance, simplicity, and ease of use.
Pretty much. Its the age old, classic set of tradeoffs with custom WC systems: A) Cool B) Quiet C) Low Cost... choose two. The only way to evaluate if its "worth it" is to decide for yourself how much more you'd be willing to spend over a $50 air cooler or a $100 CLC. Unless the answer is (practically speaking) at least $200-300, its not worth it
It's worth it to me......I have a custom loop that has been with me through 4 or 5 systems now ....when I upgrade platforms, I just buy new CPU and GPU blocks...Ive been using the same case, radiator and pump for close to 10 years....its very quiet and very good at cooling.... its a win win for me.
I chose all three with air cooling. 6 core 4GHz system with ASUS GTX580 DirectCU II that in normal use has less than 30dBA noise and at full load is only 35dBA. Loudest things are HDDs.
We need to drop CLCs out of this. They do not cool as well as air, are louder than air, will not last as long as air, are generally more expensive than air, and to cooler both CPU and GPU require 2 complete systems and still need fans to cool other motherboard and GPU components. they are not air cooler, nor are they truely functional H20 loops.
Additionally, while CLCs are not as good as water, they're not as bad as you claim they are. The top end CLCs are as good as top end air, if somewhat more expensive. In general, CLCs compete with heatsinks ~$10-30 cheaper than they are.
Loudest things are HDDs.
Sounds like a "my dog is cooler than your dog" kind of thing.You're not as cool as watercooling, so you're missing one of the three. Also, you went slightly higher cost by getting a DirectCU II model rather than a reference. So you're partially missing one and almost completely missing the other.
Additionally, while CLCs are not as good as water, they're not as bad as you claim they are. The top end CLCs are as good as top end air, if somewhat more expensive. In general, CLCs compete with heatsinks ~$10-30 cheaper than they are.
The reference comparison was for cost purposes. You buying a non-reference card meant you're paying more for better cooling, which negates the cost argument. Yes, you're plenty cool, but not as cool as you would be on water, which also negates your cooling argument.
I've never said CLC matched water. I only said it's an alternative to air, and it is a viable one. Yes, it has its drawbacks, but it has benefits as well. It's up to each individual user whether the benefits are worth the drawbacks. Obviously a heatsink cannot fail from anything short of catastrophic mechanical failure, while pumps by nature of being a moving part will fail over time. But again, each user has their own preferences and needs, and CLCs do have a place, even if they're a bit overhyped and overrated at the moment.
I agree with much of what you've said, but...
An intel CPU running below 50c or below 35c is really a mute issue. Both temps are so low it makes no difference .. none.
The cost difference between a reference card and a better cooling / quieter one is insignificant compared to the cost of even a cheap GPU water block. The slight increase in cost is drop in the ocean of the cost of a H2O loop, or even adding onto an existing loop. A couple of H2O fittings cost as much as reference to good cooling card difference .. it's only nit-picking.
There is little justification for CLC until they become competitive with air in dependability, cost, noise, and performance. At present they are not.
I agree with much of what you've said, but...
An intel CPU running below 50c or below 35c is really a mute issue. Both temps are so low it makes no difference .. none.
The cost difference between a reference card and a better cooling / quieter one is insignificant compared to the cost of even a cheap GPU water block. The slight increase in cost is drop in the ocean of the cost of a H2O loop, or even adding onto an existing loop. A couple of H2O fittings cost as much as reference to good cooling card difference .. it's only nit-picking.
There is little justification for CLC until they become competitive with air in dependability, cost, noise, and performance. At present they are not.
The H110 with upgraded fans can still cool nearly as effectively as custom-loops. Not sure why this is being glossed over, many of the highest OCs on various leaderboards are using H110/H240-X CLCs- with temperatures and quiet performance to match. Unless you plan on incorporating the GPU into a custom loop, I see it as a waste of time and money.
Well, I gave my primary reason for preferring CLC over air. The size/weight of the thing hanging off the motherboard. In a tower config, it is pulling down on the motherboard constantly, and possibly blocking slots (depending on the cooler, and other components like RAM). In a desktop config, the hanging off the motherboard is moot, but the blocking issue could still stand.
With a CLC, I transfer the vast majority of the weight to the case itself instead of the motherboard. And I have yet to see a CPU block/pump block any other component slots.
Your primary reason is not valid. The weight of the biggest heaviest air cooler does not damage the motherboard or cause any problems. Hundreds of thousands of them are in use and I have never seen or heard of one causing damage to the motherboard .. unless it was abused. Therefore it is a mute point.Well, I gave my primary reason for preferring CLC over air. The size/weight of the thing hanging off the motherboard. In a tower config, it is pulling down on the motherboard constantly, and possibly blocking slots (depending on the cooler, and other components like RAM). In a desktop config, the hanging off the motherboard is moot, but the blocking issue could still stand.
With a CLC, I transfer the vast majority of the weight to the case itself instead of the motherboard. And I have yet to see a CPU block/pump block any other component slots.
In certain cases they can be better. If your case isn't setup well for air, then a good clc can cool your processor well and at the same time exhaust that heat directly out of your case, reducing overall system temperature. You'd still need fans to cool the rest of your system, but they wouldn't have as much work to do.
Of course, for about the same price, you could get a better case. Depends on what your goal is.