Not to be Capt'n Obvious but call me Capt'n.
Intel vs AMD Processor Security: Who Makes the Safest CPUs
Intel vs AMD Processor Security: Who Makes the Safest CPUs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just gonna say something before all the AMD fanboys start slathering lube all over one another tripping over themselves to congratulate each other, other this "new" news. This article might be new, but the news is archaic at this point. Nothing is 100% secure, it just so happens that AMD had not been cutting corners on security and had no desire to sacrifice security for performance. Look at how much that dedication to security over performance helped them... Intel, insecure as they are have dominated the market for decades. The have a pile of cash that probably can't be spent in a dozen lifetimes and AMD is just now regaining market share before Intel (likely) starts kicking their asses up one street and down another in 2021-22.
AMD has a bunch of design wins but only time will tell on how all this shakes out in the end.
Intel is weak - without a massive architectural re-design their chips will still carry the flaws. The current level of mitigations are microcode based and some hardware "ish" fixes (essentially bandaids) that slow performance. I would suspect the performance hits will be felt on the 9 -10 series Intel CPUs. Maybe by 7nm they actually do something about it.
Before the Intel haters set upon me with knives and automatic weapons... I am running an AMD 3600 as my main rig.
Before dudes start yelling austically that I'm a fanboi, I was AMD for decades up until sandy bridge. Starting with my awesome 386DX 40. I thought Intel had addressed the flaws, in hardware, starting with coffee lake?
Just gonna say something before all the AMD fanboys start slathering lube all over one another tripping over themselves to congratulate each other, other this "new" news. This article might be new, but the news is archaic at this point. Nothing is 100% secure, it just so happens that AMD had not been cutting corners on security and had no desire to sacrifice security for performance. Look at how much that dedication to security over performance helped them... Intel, insecure as they are have dominated the market for decades. The have a pile of cash that probably can't be spent in a dozen lifetimes and AMD is just now regaining market share before Intel (likely) starts kicking their asses up one street and down another in 2021-22.
AMD has a bunch of design wins but only time will tell on how all this shakes out in the end.
Intel is weak - without a massive architectural re-design their chips will still carry the flaws. The current level of mitigations are microcode based and some hardware "ish" fixes (essentially bandaids) that slow performance. I would suspect the performance hits will be felt on the 9 -10 series Intel CPUs. Maybe by 7nm they actually do something about it.
Before the Intel haters set upon me with knives and automatic weapons... I am running an AMD 3600 as my main rig.
You are entitled to your opinion, naturally.that’s a lot of words to say basically nothing at all....
was that a joke?Custom secure CPU's from Google