MrGuvernment
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 21,478
So my understanding with HDMI, since it is digital that cables either work or they do not, 1 and 0's....
That is why Monster cables for a stupid amount are such a waste and other brands.
So Engadet notes just buy some Amazon cables (https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/26/cheap-great-hdmi-cables/?sr_source=Facebook ), warrantied for life and then someone posts:
And suggests https://www.audioquest.com/cables/digital-cables/hdmi/vodka
AS per the article:
That is why Monster cables for a stupid amount are such a waste and other brands.
So Engadet notes just buy some Amazon cables (https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/26/cheap-great-hdmi-cables/?sr_source=Facebook ), warrantied for life and then someone posts:
There isn't HDMI 2.1 but there is the hdcp chip that is up to a 2.2 that is also a big part of what makes HDMI cables different from one another. And if your buying a high end setup and you think that you will get the same quality out of cheap amazon cables as you do an audio quest vodka cable your crazy too.
And suggests https://www.audioquest.com/cables/digital-cables/hdmi/vodka
AS per the article:
Here's a reference in Popular Mechanics in Brand-Name HDMI Cables: Are They Worth It?:"The fact is, HDMI is digital, meaning you either get the feed or you don't. High prices and gimmicks like gold-plating don't affect 1s and 0s. Our advice: Purchase your wiring online for cheap, and use the saved money to upgrade to a larger flat screen."
And although this is another one of mine, it shows all the hands-on testing I did leading up to the first CNET article. "The fact is, below 50 feet, performance is going to be a LOT more uniform. In other words, you'll have more cables that will work on everything. As such, it's even more likely that a cheap cable will perform the same as their more expensive counterparts. At short distances (under 10 feet), like we've always said, there's not going to be any difference."