thewizard1785
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2004
- Messages
- 153
Except, it's not...Kingston KC3000 is as fast , 7000/7000 on raw speed, and cheaper right now and 2TB
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09K7DRMSC/ref=twister_B09M7Q8P7S?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
Dam that changed quick!
It will be back I am sure, once the 990 drops...It's a pity I'm saving up for a Radeon 6700XT or I'd jump on this deal.
Does anyone know how the Hynix compares to the Samsung 990 Pro? I haven't found a benchmark comparing them.
What's the price difference? P41 is a better drive.I'm torn between the SK Hynix Platinum P41 and the WD Black SN850X which are both on sale right now.
Yeah, I'm seeing glowing reviews too, among the small number of them that seem to exist for the Hynix Platinum P41. But I specifically want to see how it compares to Samsung's 990 Pro, which just released. The image posted by Tainted Squirrel offers the only direct comparison I've seen, so far.A quick search shows brings up reviews from Storage Review and Tom's. Everything I've seen about it is positive. Overall both, along with the latest WD Black, are all about the same, +/- a few percentage points in benchmarks.
The 2nd Amazon review looks like it's running at Gen3 speeds, ~3 GB/s in R/W.These Amazon reviews complaining that the Hynix Platinum P41 doesn't get its advertised speed, what was likely causing that? Do people here who own P41s get the advertised speeds?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-...=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B09QVD9V7R
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-...=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B09QVD9V7R
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-...=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B09QVD9V7R
I saw it mentioned somewhere that the Samsung 980 Pro is a bit more reliable than the Hynix P41. What metric would that be based on - some failure rate stat?
What's the price difference? P41 is a better drive.
Still shows the same price, same day delivery, and in stock
"Best" depends on use case. 990 Pro actually gets beat by Firecuda 830 or Rocket 4 Plus in sustained writes once the cache is exhausted. Important to me because I write large files constantly, and do full image restores often. When considering price yet it can't even beat a two year old drive in an important metric, 990 Pro not even in ballpark for me.The 990 Pro is a new 'best drive'. But the 1 TB version currents costs what the 2 TB Hynix Platinum P41 does on sale at Amazon.com.
To the best of your knowledge, which 2tb nvme drive is the best overall performer including the cache issues etc? I bought a 980pro and worried about possible issues, so I am considering returning it as I am still in teh return period window."Best" depends on use case. 990 Pro actually gets beat by Firecuda 830 or Rocket 4 Plus in sustained writes once the cache is exhausted. Important to me because I write large files constantly, and do full image restores often. When considering price yet it can't even beat a two year old drive in an important metric, 990 Pro not even in ballpark for me.
To make a fully informed buying decision you owe it to find out the speed of the underlying NAND. 99% of review sites just do the same lame benchmarks of CDM & ATTO etc that merely bench the controller & cache.
There's more variance than people realize because the NAND is typically 85-90% of BOM and so thats where the vendor shenanigans will be to make their margin - cheaper and slower NAND hidden behind incrementally faster controller and cache.
What did you discover about it?After some digging on DirectStorage performance, I ended up returning mine and switching to the SN850X for the same price.
NVMe drives with Phison controllers outperform other drives in DirectStorage, Toms did a simulated benchmark:What did you discover about it?
Where did you get it? I can't find the x model on Newegg or Amazon? Those are the only 2 places I buy from.After some digging on DirectStorage performance, I ended up returning mine and switching to the SN850X for the same price.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0B7CMZ3QH/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DERWhere did you get it? I can't find the x model on Newegg or Amazon? Those are the only 2 places I buy from.
Have a look at this Corsair"Best" depends on use case. 990 Pro actually gets beat by Firecuda 830 or Rocket 4 Plus in sustained writes once the cache is exhausted. Important to me because I write large files constantly, and do full image restores often. When considering price yet it can't even beat a two year old drive in an important metric, 990 Pro not even in ballpark for me.
To make a fully informed buying decision you owe it to find out the speed of the underlying NAND. 99% of review sites just do the same lame benchmarks of CDM & ATTO etc that merely bench the controller & cache.
There's more variance than people realize because the NAND is typically 85-90% of BOM and so thats where the vendor shenanigans will be to make their margin - cheaper and slower NAND hidden behind incrementally faster controller and cache.
NVMe drives with Phison controllers outperform other drives in DirectStorage, Toms did a simulated benchmark:
https://www.tomshardware.com/features/the-directstorage-advantage-phison-io-ssd-firmware-preview/2
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/c...e_the_directstorage_advantage_phison/ij5v12l/
At the top of the list is the KC3000, which uses a Phison E18 controller. You'll notice the Hynix P41 is getting destroyed.
Supposedly the SN850X's "Game Mode 2.0" setting provides the same benefits for DirectStorage as the Phison drives.
Currently, the P41, KC3000, and SN850X are all the same price ($168-$170). The P41 is the best overall drive, but the worst for DirectStorage. The KC3000 is potentially better for DirectStorage, but the worst overall drive of the 3. Assuming the SN850X's game mode can match Phison in DirectStorage, it's the best deal.
There may be better deals on other Phison-based drives out there, but I can only go off what Toms benchmarked. I'm also too lazy to dig through every Phison drive looking for a sale.
The SN850X is a little bit weaker in the 4K tests and actually seems to do better with Game Mode engaged. The SN770, which has the same flash, does remarkably well. All of these drives provide enough performance for a good experience, although the P5 Plus notably falls behind the rest. We cannot say much for high IOPS being necessary at this time, however it is likely the SN850X would do better in simulated DirectStorage tests than the original SN850 and other non-Phison drives.