![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
I noticed the same recently, seems to be just a wonky side effect though since the performance is as expected.
Next step is overclocking your wallet and turning it into a 7900 XTX...
Actually i Think i skip the 7000 Series. My friend Got oced 7900xt. And he only barely beats me ingame fps. The xtx sure is faster. But not worth it when i Got this fast a 6900xt 😅
sorry 6thI think that puts me in 4th place for the Watercooled rankings as well.
Nice that it worked, I've added you to the list ... I think you still have some margin
26000 would be cool ! ... and certainly as your daily OC ... anyway first place
, now we just need a link to the validated result 26099 for Daily settings !!! Did itsorry 6th
Nice that it worked, I've added you to the list ... I think you still have some margin
26000 would be cool ! ... and certainly as your daily OC ... anyway first place
(no worries if you forgot to save your highest run, i recently found out that all the results are automatically saved under \Documents\3DMark\, which you can load and then publish)
So the race is between the XTXH and the chiller !
(I'll just put it here again for convenience)
Water Cooling:
1. 25926 Nordskov, the 'XTXH' (to be validated)
2. 25695 BelowAmbient, the 'chiller' https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/85243423
3. 24467 bl4C3y3 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/85513441?
4. 24412 Catsonar https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26633741
5. 23767 nxcess https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/87704556?
6. 23452 R-Type https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86001914?
7. 23411 Zarathustra[H] https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/68596722?
8. 23029 Gideon https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71914412?
9. 22850 NightReaver https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75867005?
10. 22062 Chassepot (6800XT)
Air Cooling:
1. 23079 Mysterfix https://www.3dmark.com/spy/28585113
2. 22735 bl4C3y3 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/72273323?
3. 22663 John1780 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/72045575?
4. 22397 Starfalcon https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26262182
5. 22049 alceryes3 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26674135
6. 21364 Thecold
7. 21269 Gideon
8. 21261 AVATARAT (6800XT) https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/72606418
9. 20994 kwikgta
10. 20978 newls1
Good insight on the memory, how are you doing that Nordskov? Mine gets flaky above 2130 with tight timings, assume you're running loose? Any other modifications?
I had the same issue. Couldn't even go above 2120 MHz. Increase the SoC value (the box in red) until the card is stable. I did 100 at a time. Use timespy to check stability. 2150MHz score will be higher than 2125 MHz (I did 25MHz increments).
He has the XTXH chip ("sapphire toxic extreme xtxh"), it's a higher clocked chip and has 2250 MHz (18 Gbps) memory vs the normal 2000 MHz (16 Gbps).
I have never dared to touch those values, interesting, maybe i should give it a try ... not that there is much to win in my case, I get it stable at 2140 (with default of value 800), but not so much at 2150 ... or maybe the unsuccessful runs with 2140 are actually also caused by this value
, so maybe I can get the other clocks higher when upping this valueyes, mine is also at 3000 ... on the other hand, I think you can turn many of the settings of in the first tab under "overdrive features", but not really sure
Depending on how my inner monologue plays out once these new shiny cards arrive this week, I know where you could get a great deal on the 6th fastest 6900XT known to [H]...
my 6900 xt does following:Thought I'd share the comparison table I made from scraping reviews to try and talk myself out of buying a new GPU (which I failed to do as I currently have both a 7900XTX and 4090 inbound, but one or both will be going back on FS/FT).
At my daily OC the 6900XT is within spitting distance of the 7900XT. In fact when you consider that the 7900XT has 5% more CU cores, it certainly seems like the new cards aren't taking advantage of the doubling of throughput per CU that AMD was touting. Whether this is a failed design or shit drivers that are going to drop some 'fine wine' ass kicking later remains to be seen. Still, our 2 year old $1000 cards keeping pace with a just released $900 card is always nice to see. (It would be interesting to see if Nordskov can outright match the 7900XT...)
An assumed 10% OC on the 7900XTX (I have an XFX merc coming) puts it 10-15% behind the 4090 in rasterization, but that raytracing advantage is insurmountable.
View attachment 547269
Depending on how my inner monologue plays out once these new shiny cards arrive this week, I know where you could get a great deal on the 6th fastest 6900XT known to [H]...
As long as we refuse to discuss power efficiency, this is damn impressive!my 6900 xt does following:
TSE 12582 Here 7900xt is almost 1% slower
FSU: 17579 Here 7900xt is 7% slower
Port Royal: 12179 here 7900xt is around 12% faster
so pretty damn close to a 7900xt stock
During timespy extreme it runs at 450-500wAs long as we refuse to discuss power efficiency, this is damn impressive!
If you let me know your core/mem/power draw I can add it to the chart.
![Zarathustra[H]](https://cdn.hardforum.com/data/avatars/m/9/9298.jpg?1677728934){kind=avatar}
hmm tbh i dont really know, in the start (january 22, i bought the card, pushed 24400 easy) then drivers got better, i repastet and got lower temps and raised vcore a bit now that temps was lower, then i was able to boost higher, and now with new lc bios, im breaking 26.000 for timespy daily, and the card litterelly just flyes in all gamesThat's pretty cool!
I wonder what changed.
When I first broke the 23000 graphics score on my 6900xt that was considered very good, and really pushing the limits.
Are we talking better drivers since then? Beter silicon maturity? Winning the GPU lottery? Or are you just that much better at overclocking than I am?
Yeah... something like that... 😅
my 6900 xt does following:
TSE 12582 Here 7900xt is almost 1% slower
FSU: 17579 Here 7900xt is 7% slower
Port Royal: 12179 here 7900xt is around 12% faster
so pretty damn close to a 7900xt stock
what a piece of love this driver deserves lol
Downloading now. Unfortunately its hard to interpret this as anything other than AMD intentionally holding back architectural raytracing improvements for last gen cards in order to make the new cards look more impressive for a couple months. For shame.Damn guys tryed newest driver 23.2.1 timespy a little lower now 25800 aprox. Buuuuut port royal jumped from 12288 to 13019!!!! Thats a massive jump lol. Practically closing the gap even more with the 7900xt
EDIT: Testet Modern warfare 2 benchmark with this driver.. it even improved here aswell, from 246avg fps to 255!!!! at high settings 1440p and fsr on quality, even beats my friends 7900xt he avg around 242 fps same settings, at native no fsr high settings, he gets 174fps i get 182 fps !!
True But really aint complaining 🤞😁. this massive a boost to raytracing etc is really great !! Makes me believe these improvement to 6000 Series aint all we seen yet.
and still at daily settings
