Some benchmarks results of the Sapphire Nitro+ 7900 XT... Updated Scores: 1/3/22

SamiiRoss

SamiiRoss

Gawd
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
671
There is no nitro 7900 xtx available because they don't even last a minute on Newegg. tired of waiting for the last 2 weeks I bought this one. For my video processing, "job" i use topaz ai and proteus fine-tune, the card shaved almost 25-35% of processing time on 4k videos which is a great.
I ran some benchmarks, and I found the numbers of some of the "YouTubers" are kinda wrong... there is no coil whine, even playing Fortnite at 4k@144hz "competitive", the card pulls about 140 watts, and reaches about 57-63c...

IMG_8037.JPG


Settings:
BIOS: Default
GPU Clock: Stock
Boost Clock: Stock
Undervolt: 975mv
Power Limit +15%
VRAM Clock: +270 MHz

bandicam 2022-12-31 08-47-11-021.jpg


Updated Scores 1/3/23
Driver: Adrenaline 22.12.2


FIRE STRIKE
SCORE: 49,367
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/29214655

FIRE STRIKE EXTREME
SCORE: 33,246
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86430211?

FIRE STRIKE ULTRA
SCORE: 19,021
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86199950?

TIME SPY EXTREME
SCORE: 11,575
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86432910?

TIME SPY
SCORE: 24,473
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86497460?

PORT ROYAL:
SCORE: 16,062
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/86429248?



Geekbench
Vulkan Score: 255,627
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/6179152

OpenCL Score: 206,002
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/6174196


Waiting on new drivers for improvements.
 

Attachments

  • bandicam 2022-12-30 06-29-56-204.jpg
    bandicam 2022-12-30 06-29-56-204.jpg
    301.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_8052.JPG
    IMG_8052.JPG
    335.5 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
B

Bowman15

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
1,924
We'd better not catch you posting some useful fps gaming numbers we can compare to other cards.
 
SamiiRoss

SamiiRoss

Gawd
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
671
Bowman15 said:
We'd better not catch you posting some useful fps gaming numbers we can compare to other cards.
Click to expand...
sure... I think this is the only game I own that has a benchmark option and seems to be broken anyway... fullscreen/windowed = different results.

Full Screen
114-1.png


Windowed:
tombraider.png
 
G

gvx64

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Messages
236
SamiiRoss said:
the card pulls about 140 watts, and reaches about 57-63c...
Click to expand...
That's idling, though, right? I am pretty sure it supposed to pull north of 300W under load.

Congrats on the new card. You're definitely pulling some [H] numbers there!
 
Z

ZeroBarrier

Gawd
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Messages
727
gvx64 said:
That's idling, though, right? I am pretty sure it supposed to pull north of 300W under load.

Congrats on the new card. You're definitely pulling some [H] numbers there!
Click to expand...
Most likely idle in the in-game menu. The 7900 series are power hogs for the for their actual performance in comparison to Lovelace for sure.

index.png

index.png
 
W

WorldExclusive

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
11,536
The new driver improved power consumption and 1% lows. Comparing new driver results to launch day drivers.
 
SamiiRoss

SamiiRoss

Gawd
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
671
gvx64 said:
That's idling, though, right? I am pretty sure it supposed to pull north of 300W under load.

Congrats on the new card. You're definitely pulling some [H] numbers there!
Click to expand...
I think it’s because Fortnite's competitive mode doesn’t demand too much. It’s more like a “low graphics, high refresh, and low input lag thing. But, During the shadow of the tomb raider benchmark the card was pulling between 348w-370w while boosting a bit over 3ghz. Also, the difference between 2.9ghz and 3ghz is like 40watts.
 
Z

ZeroBarrier

Gawd
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Messages
727
Mr Evil said:
It's strange that you say that and then contradict yourself by posting a chart that shows the reference 7900 XT to be the most efficient card by quite a bit.
Click to expand...
Slightly edging out a 4080; but hey, small wins for the AMD fans, right? 🙄
 
N

noko

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
7,070
ZeroBarrier said:
Slightly edging out a 4080; but hey, small wins for the AMD fans, right? 🙄
Click to expand...
Not sure your point on power hog where the chart you posted shows otherwise??? Some other fan? If it is more efficient then the 4080 per frame -> More efficient. What am I missing here?
 
B

Bowman15

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
1,924
noko said:
Not sure your point on power hog where the chart you posted shows otherwise??? Some other fan? If it is more efficient then the 4080 per frame -> More efficient. What am I missing here?
Click to expand...

Bleeding green is serious business.
 
L

LukeTbk

2[H]4U
Joined
Sep 10, 2020
Messages
3,628
gvx64 said:
That's idling, though, right? I am pretty sure it supposed to pull north of 300W under load.

Congrats on the new card. You're definitely pulling some [H] numbers there!
Click to expand...
Those card often do not play under load, depending on your monitor res-max hz and the game played.

noko said:
Not sure your point on power hog where the chart you posted shows otherwise??? Some other fan? If it is more efficient then the 4080 per frame -> More efficient. What am I missing here?
Click to expand...
There is no clear way to define power efficiency (even more than performance, because you add a new variable to that one), techpowerup for example:

watt-per-frame.png


Power hog many a bit much, but more of one vs a 4080 than the 3090TI was relative to a 6800xt, but they used a single game for those metric, the poster saw many case where that the case:

power-vsync.png


Assumed that it was always the same for every bunch of title played in every condition, quick google and paste without looking.
 
L

lopoetve

Extremely [H]
Joined
Oct 11, 2001
Messages
33,586
Nice. Beat my 3090, but I'm only using a 10700k on the compute side for now.
 
SamiiRoss

SamiiRoss

Gawd
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
671
LukeTbk said:
There is no clear way to define power efficiency (even more than performance, because you add a new variable to that one), techpowerup for example:
View attachment 538730

Assumed that it was always the same for every bunch of title played in every condition, quick google and paste without looking.
Click to expand...
Is that power consumption idling on desktop? Old drivers?
 
N

noko

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
7,070
LukeTbk said:
Those card often do not play under load, depending on your monitor res-max hz and the game played.


There is no clear way to define power efficiency (even more than performance, because you add a new variable to that one), techpowerup for example:

View attachment 538729

Power hog many a bit much, but more of one vs a 4080 than the 3090TI was relative to a 6800xt, but they used a single game for those metric, the poster saw many case where that the case:

View attachment 538730

Assumed that it was always the same for every bunch of title played in every condition, quick google and paste without looking.
Click to expand...
Plus what game is picked can have a wildly different result. Picking for example COD Modern Warfare where AMD has a significant lead over Nvidia would skew it one way while Metro Enhanced Edition towards Nvidia. 30%+ differences in frame rates.

I think the real champion for power efficiency is the 4090, reduce the power target, performance does not go down hardly at all while less than 350w beating anything in its wake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top