![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
You mean raytracing stuff? That'll change. NV jumped first on raytracing and got a bit ahead. It won't last. It never does. AMD will catch up. I do think NV and AMD are onto something with DLSS and FSR though, and I hope they'll turn into a standard API feature going forward. In other words the way I want it to work is a game can just turn scaling on in DX or Vulcan or whatever and it just works. The vid card driver can take care of how it works if it provides an implementation, otherwise you get something like AMD FSR. In other words a game just turns on scaling, and if you have a recent NV card you get DLSS, if you don't you get FSR, and if AMD or NV come up with something better in the future you get that.
it never claimed to
I would agree that on a RTX 3080 as tested but I guess a Radeon card and driver can not run DLSS 2.0 to find out if the game engine is bias to Nvidia to even have DLSS 2.0 in the game kind of answers who payed the most ..like Fry Cry 6 is all for AMD ..
Yes, except they kinda did before they released itit never claimed to
"subtle difference" my ass
At the least, Deathloop's FSR doesn't appear to include its own sharpening pass. And similarly, the sharpening in its DLSS also seems relatively relaxed, compared to other games. This aligns with Nvidia's recent tools updates for developers, literally giving them a sharpening slider.
Well I would say this single slide is ambiguous, at best. However, I don't pretend to have a catalogue of all the ways FSR was marketed, throughout time. So let me redo my post and say
AMD didn't claim reconstruction, AA, or even a temporal element, around release time.it never claimed to
It is good though. I'm getting great results in many games, even with 3rd party tools, it works fine.
This is exactly what they were targeting. They wanted something that could scale to any hardware, old and new, without needing to have custom silicon or an expensive gpu to use it.
I finally moved up to 1080p Ultra and HD is on .. I did get a nice boost in frame rate just turning FSR on to as what my understanding that it was made to do for most any video card .. frame rate in upper left corner
Right. I'm sure they could have designed some fancy AI algorithm, that only works with a special chip on their most expensive new GPU, but that is not helpful.
DLSS 1.0 was fancy AI upscaling algorithm.
From what I can tell FSR is pretty much the same thing as Radeon Image Sharpening that AMD tried to sell as DLSS alternative back in 2019, just with nicer packaging, hyper up marketing and itself put on steroids to the point it looks completely broken. At least in some games which overdid settings.
Crusades are good for gaining valuable insight about topics.
It looks nothing like native and shows way too much sharpening, things like ringing artifacts and rendering quirks (on the floor of Doom shot) getting overblown. Don't you see that?
No, I don't see that. I think you're just trolling at this point because the quality looks great.
Here you go my friend
Well I play at 144Hz at high resolutions, so there is never enough power. Granted, I am mostly CPU limited at around 120fps in newer games, and over 90fps is still great, but why not get free performance?
If I’m over 100FPS I’ll trade quality for any more perf. Sync makes it clean regardless at that point- and I play mostly single player. 3090 let’s me crank. Set refresh is 120hz normally for me.
, well do that if you want, just does not make much sense, I rather have my full eye potential for motion vice being handicapped with premature motion blurring. I do like DLSS better than FSR so far, some games I've found it usable and beneficial, others not.
Just a guess, but D? Seems to be overly sharpened to the point the walls look terrible.
If you cannot see details anyway - as you are pointing out so often - then just drop resolution. This is what gives the best performance, lowest input latency and has proper working VRR support.
Again FSR does not work with any game. At least so far it cannot be made to do so without obvious issues.
I mentioned DLSS a lot a the beginning because I was disappointed about how FSR works. I thought it will be something like DLSS 2.0, just without AI stuff. It would be useful tech not only for PC but also for consoles.
You mean you get FSR if you turn on GPU scaling in the control panel? That would be good for games that don't have scaling built in, which is most of them. I'd want DLSS as an option on NV RTX cards though. No need to pick one, just add it to the settings in the control panel & let me set it per application along with a system default. Similarly I'd want whatever Intel is cooking and anything AMD comes up with in the future. I'd still rather have scaling just become and API (DirectX, Vulcan, etc.) and driver feature though. Game dev just makes an API call to turn on scaling and you get whatever your GPU vendor provides -- with tweaking options in their proprietary control panel along with vendor specific tweaking APIs.
Wrong. It is offered openly by contacting them, and for unity + unreal engine as a publicly available plug in.
Not as sharpened as FSR related horrors I saw on internets
